МАСО
Развиваем и поддерживаем социальное обеспечение во всем мире.
International Social Security Review

 

International Social Security Review

First published in 1948, the International Social Security Review is the principal international quarterly publication in the field of social security.

Articles by leading social security experts around the world present international comparisons and in-depth discussions of topical questions as well as studies of social security systems in different countries, and there is a regular, comprehensive round-up of all the latest publications in its field.

The International Social Security Review  is also available in French, Spanish or German.

 

Subscribe to the International Social Security Review.

 

INFORMATION AND SUBSCRIPTIONS

 

With the creation of a new online publications platform by the international publishing house Wiley-Blackwell, online access to articles published in the International Social Security Review  since 1967 is now available to subscribers. 

Consult a free sample issue of the International Social Security Review  online, or visit Wiley Online Library to browse contents and abstracts of all issues. For further information on how to access the articles please visit our Librarian Site.

To submit an article to the International Social Security Review , please consult the online Author Guidelines >>

International Social Security Review  Editorial Board >>

ISSA member organizations can access the complete current issue and electronic archive of the Review through the ISSA Extranet >>

 

Current issue: Article abstracts

Volume 65 Issue 1 (January‐March 2012)

 
The performance of social security contributory and tax‐financed pensions in Central America, and the effects of the global crisis (pp. 1 - 27)

Over the last 30 years, Latin America has pioneered structural pension reforms. This article focuses on a representative regional sample of seven Central American countries with diverse levels of development (Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama) studying contributory and tax‐financed pensions as well as recent pension reforms. It comparatively assesses system performance regarding five social security principles: unity; universal coverage; adequacy of benefits; equal treatment, solidarity and gender equality; and financial sustainability. It also evaluates the impact of the world crisis on these pension systems, highlighting the differences between public and private pensions, and extracts lessons and suggests policies for the future.

 
Health insurance system financing reforms in the Netherlands, Germany and France: Repercussions for coverage and redistribution? (pp. 29 - 51)

For a number of years, the Dutch, German and French health insurance systems have been attempting to contain costs and diversify their sources of finance, which traditionally have come mainly from social contributions. Diversification may involve broader‐based public finance, as well as greater recourse to private resources and operators. In the case of the Netherlands and Germany, the reforms go hand in hand with efforts to introduce competition between health insurance bodies. In France, private complementary insurance has become indispensable for adequate access to health care. However, these measures have repercussions for redistribution, which social assistance programmes have difficulty in addressing.

 
Semi‐conditional cash transfers in the form of family allowances for children and adolescents in the informal economy in Argentina (pp. 53 - 72)

In 2009, Argentina introduced a new transfer programme for children and adolescents younger than age 18 (Universal Child Allowance) that extended coverage under the contributory programme for family allowances to include families in the informal economy and families of unemployed persons. This article describes this innovative programme, compares it with similar programmes in Latin America and analyses its impact on coverage and its possible effects on the welfare of the population. The results indicate that the extension of access to this type of benefit has reduced considerably the coverage gap for the poor and indigent and supports efforts to consolidate the operations of different and poorly coordinated transfer programmes.

 
Testing old theories in new surroundings: The timing of first social security laws in Africa (pp. 73 - 97)

This article examines the timing of the introduction of four major social security programmes — work accident insurance, sickness benefits, pensions, and family allowances — in 43 African countries. Further, it explores whether legislative structure, dominant religion or the colonial past of the country is of importance when we control for year of independence, prosperity, degree of democracy, government stability, industrialization and the size and ethnic homogeneity of the population. On the basis of Cox hazard rate modelling it is concluded that industrialized, homogeneous and rather populous countries that were under French rule tend to be pioneers in African social security legislation.

 
The effectiveness of Luxembourg's minimum guaranteed income (pp. 99 - 116)

Using micro‐data for the year 2007, this article analyzes the effectiveness of Luxembourg's minimum guaranteed income (revenu minimum garanti — RMG) social assistance programme. First, we examine the effectiveness of the RMG by comparing the proportion of eligible households based on the different criteria for the years 2007 and 1986, and find that, in 2007, 5.5 per cent of households were eligible versus 3.75 per cent in 1986. A relaxation of the RMG's eligibility criteria implies that more low‐income households should have access to the RMG. As a second measure of programme effectiveness, the article estimates the extent of non‐takeup behaviour among those eligible for the RMG in 2007. It is found that just over 65 per cent of all households potentially entitled to the RMG do not claim. Regression analysis of the potential determinants of non‐takeup behaviour confirms the hypotheses derived from theoretical models in the literature, i.e. that rational motivation, such as the expected net utility from claiming, and stigma, play a major role in explaining levels of non‐takeup.

Publications contact

Please contact the following address for additional information on our publications: