Overview of the impact of the crisis on social security financing

• The majority of social security administrations experienced financing difficulties as a result of the crisis.
• High-income countries were the most affected by the crisis and had negative performances in their investment portfolios 2008 ranging from -30.6 per cent (Ireland) to - 3.2 per cent (Denmark).
• By the end of 2008, the most important funds experienced combined losses in their assets under management of about USD 225 billion.
• Losses were however unrealized. Most funds were able to recover part of their original value once stock markets recovered.
• Diversification of fund assets failed in most cases to protect portfolios and, even more importantly, international diversification actually worsened the situation and generated deeper losses.
• Most funds have now recovered to their pre-crisis levels.
• The crisis illustrates the risks of funding social security programmes from sources that are dependent on the performance of capital markets.

Government responses to the crisis

• The survey confirms that the majority of national governments provided assistance to financial institutions or adopted other economic recovery measures.
• The majority of social security administrations report that their national governments included some provision for social security within their national crisis response measures.
• On average, measures directed to social security represented 12 per cent of national stimulus packages.
• Coordinated national stimulus packages and the stabilizing effect of social security limited the economic and social consequences of the crisis.
• If stimulus packages are discontinued prematurely, experts warn that there is a danger that a double-dip recession could emerge.
• While the need to reduce fiscal deficits built up during the time of the crisis is important for governments, the long-term impact on unemployment and social expenditure, and the erosion of the tax bases, could be considerable.

Impact of the crisis on labour markets

• A majority of countries experienced an increase in unemployment and therefore adopted a wide range of measures to address this increase.
• A number of short to mid-term measures were introduced to deal with the impact of increased unemployment.
• For some social security institutions, the crisis was used as an opportunity to extend coverage (South Africa) and bolster the adequacy (Russian Federation) of their benefits.
• Social security administrations estimate that they will have to contend with the consequences of the crisis for labour markets for 2-4 more years.
• A number of social security administrations made special provisions for vulnerable groups.

Conclusions

• Depleted fund reserves, diminished income and increased expenditure on benefits were the main consequences of the crisis experienced by administrations.
• Social security played a crucial role by sustaining the economy through maintaining public confidence and therefore stimulating aggregate demand. Arguably, social security contributed to reducing the potential for significant social unrest.
• Financing difficulties look set to persist for the foreseeable future as a result of a protracted labour market crisis, and debts incurred now will constitute a financial burden for many years to come.
• If there are future financial or economic shocks (e.g. in the case of a double-dip recession) in the near-term, there is concern that government finances, as well as the financial reserves of social security funds, would be unable to bankroll the necessary response measures on a scale comparable with that witnessed in the last few years.
• The crisis has underlined the value of social security as an effective response to crises and also as a social intervention integral to the smooth functioning of decent societies.
• Social security administrations have demonstrated their capacity to be actors in response to the financial and economic crises.

Download

English [ 2-Crisis-survey-final.pdf 547.61 kB ]